An
excellent issue in my view
(especially since I haven't
contributed this time ;-)).
Already twelve years that
our e-zine exists, and counting.
Well done, Johannes and gang!
CONCERT
REVIEW by Nick Morgan
THE TROGGS
100 Club, London, April 3rd 2009
I’m
not sure how many people remember
the
Troggs. My old mum
does – I asked her - “disgusting”,
she said, “tight trousers
and filthy lyrics”. There
are six of us who do (who all, I
should add, jumped at the chance
for tickets), and a few more besides
in the 100 Club, but it is, let’s
say, far from crowded for a Friday
night. It’s a shame.
The
Troggs, you may recall, were propelled
to stardom in 1966 when only their
second record, a song called ‘Wild
thing’ (written by American
composer Chip
Taylor) went to number one in
both the United States and the UK.
Hard-edged, with a distinctive driving
guitar and suitably risqué
lyrics, it became an overnight classic.
They followed this up with a string
of hits over the next couple of years.
One, ‘Anyway that you want
me’, was also written by Taylor,
but the remainder were penned by
front man and vocalist, former bricklayer,
Reg Ball, otherwise known as Reg
Presley, thanks to an adroit name
change by then manager Larry Paige
(whom they shared, with amongst
others, the Kinks). Presley certainly
had a way with words: ‘Give
it to me’, ‘With a girl
like you’ and ‘I can’t
control myself’ (banned by
the BBC) were three of his more
suggestive works. But
his most famous, and the Troggs’
final chart hit of any measure was
1967’s ‘Love is all
around’, adopted by Richard
Curtis as the theme for his film
Four Weddings and a Funeral, and
as performed by Wet Wet Wet, a British
number one hit for fifteen weeks.
Reg, known for his interest in the
para-normal (his 2002 book Wild
things they don’t tell us
displays his love of conspiracy
theories), used much of the money
to fund research into crop
circles, a phenomenon of some
importance in Presley’s native
Hampshire. Which, of course is where
his piratical West Country burr
comes from, a somewhat disarming
accent for an apparently salacious
and scandalous sixty-eight-year-old
rock and roller.
Reg
Presley
He
is an effortless performer, barely
breaking sweat as the band work through
fourteen songs including all of their
hits and a smattering of R&B standards
such as ‘Louie Louie’
and ‘Walking the dog’.
The hard work was being done by the
band, and notably original Troggs
guitarist Chris Britton, whose crunching
guitar sound defined ‘Wild thing’,
and earned the Troggs their status
as one of the forerunners of punk
and garage rock, their influence acknowledged
by the likes of Iggy Pop and the Ramones.
It’s interesting to compare
Britton’s technique (or possibly
lack of it) with that of Jonathan
Brentman, lead guitarist with the
Foxes, whose quick-fire melodic
pop tunes (strongly reminiscent of
Joe Jackson I thought) made up the
first set of the evening. Brentman
was very good, but if there was a
difficult way to play something then
he chose it. By comparison Britton
took route one each time, and it has
to be said, to far greater effect.
Presley leered and letched his way
through the songs (with an unnerving
steely glance with which he held the
audience captive) and added a few
reminiscences between numbers. The
audience danced, sang, and playfully
heckled in absurd accents, and generally
enjoyed a very good, if undemanding,
Friday night’s entertainment.
The
Troggs are about to tour the UK with
what’s left of the Move and
Love Affair in one of those dreadful
sixties
packages that seem to be cashing
in on the ‘grey pound’
at the moment, so if you are in the
UK there’s a chance to see them
in some of the lesser venues that
the country boasts (I used to live
in Bedworth,
but does anyone else really even know
where it is?). However in the meantime
you could always get a taste of Reg
and the boys at work by listening
to the ‘notorious’ Troggs
tapes, said amongst other things,
to have inspired a scene in This is
Spinal Tap. Enjoy. - Nick Morgan
(photographs by Kate)
Listen:
MySpace pages of Chip
Taylor and a fairly recent medley
by the
Troggs on the inevitable Youtube.
Oh, and Wild Thing on... an iPhone:
TASTING
– FOUR RATHER YOUNG ARDBEGS
Alambic's
Special Islay Malt 2000/2008 (42.9%,
Alambic Classique, Germany, finished
in Pineau des Charentes cask, cask
#81122, 498 decanters)
A very strange treatment on this undisclosed
Ardbeg (oops). Pineau des Charentes
is a fortified wine that old and sometimes
decrepit French women use to drink
as an aperitif (it’s always
aperitif time in France anyway). Colour:
pale gold. Nose: ermnlmblrmln…
Wazzat? It’s not that it’s
ugly, mind you, but strange it is.
Gin fizz, orange tonic, lemongrass
and ginger liqueur, heavily peppered
melon, smoked beef, effervescent vitamin
C… Then ham and bacon…
Not unpleasant I must say, especially
since these fizzy notes do slowly
vanish and leave more room for the
‘raw, naked’ spirit. Mouth:
well, this works, at least for the
first five seconds, but there’s
something a little, say twisted happening
after that. Peppered lemon juice?
Spiced-up cranberry juice? The same
notes of ripe melons develop on the
palate, even very ripe apricots and
plums, with Ardbeg’s smokiness
creating kind of a… third dimension?
Finish: medium long, first creamily
fruity and then a tad grassy and bitterish,
with a little caramel and honey in
the aftertaste. Comments: one of these
U.F.M.s (unidentified flying malts)
that are very funny to try and assess
but I’m not sure a whole decanter
would go down quick enough…
I’d say it’s ‘not
bad at all’, but Alambic Classique
had and has many excellent bottlings
that are much more to our liking.
SGP:636 - 76 points.
Ardbeg
13 yo 1994/2007 (59.7%, Cadenhead's
Authentic Collection, bourbon hogshead,
348 bottles)
Colour: white wine. Nose: a raw, yeasty,
porridgy young Ardbeg with quite some
vanilla, lemon and a lot of…
alcohol. Not much peat, this one reminds
me a bit of the famous ‘Kildaltons’
1980/1981. A little hard to enjoy
when at full strength, let’s
add water. With water: more of the
same, and even more porridge and baker’s
yeast but also more maritime notes
(seashells, ‘a walk on the beach’
and all that jazz). Improved a bit.
Mouth (neat): powerful, crisp, very
smoky this time but once again, not
extraordinarily peaty as such. Quite
some pepper, grass (green tea), green
vegetables, chlorophyll gums…
An unusually grassy Ardbeg. With water:
it got good, with a pleasant combination
of dried fruits (notably quinces and
oranges) with soft spices, a good
smokiness and a few resinous notes
that really are an asset here. Finish:
long but quite bizarrely, the yeasty
and porridgy notes stroke back, as
if they wouldn’t melt into the
peat and the fruitiness. Comments:
very good on the palate when diluted,
otherwise just above standards (not
Ardbeggian standards!). SGP:356
- 80 points.
Ardbeg
1993/2005 (43%, Gordon & MacPhail,
Connoisseur's Choice)
Colour: pale gold. Nose: it’s
strange how this one sort of glows,
with great moments that remind us
of the old 10s (coal smoke, ash, lemon),
and then plain yeasty and porridgy
phases, all on warm yoghurt, wet cardboard
and soaked grains. Keeps improving
after that but lacks a little more
oomph and ‘straightforwardness’
for a young Ardbeg. Let’s say
it’s ‘decent’. Mouth:
really in keeping with the nose, with
maybe a little less cardboard but
also more grass, liquorice wood and
ginger. Notes of aspirin, not too
pleasant, and quite some salt as well.
The peatiness is rather big that is,
but the whole experience is a little
frustrating. Finish: medium long but
nicer because of the funny notes of
sweetened mustard that do appear.
Comments: maybe a slightly bigger
body, brought by a bottling at 46%
vol., would have made this puppy more,
say noticeable. Now, it’s perfectly
drinkable youngish Ardbeg. SGP:366
- 78 points.
Ardbeg
1992/2007 (51.6%, Scott's Selection,
'Single Highland Malt')
Whether Islay should be considered
as being in the Highlands or not…
I don’t know. Probably not.
Colour: white wine. Nose: extremely
close to the Cadenhead’s in
style, only a little more austere
and flinty at first nosing, and then
a little farmier (cow stable). Once
again, there’s a lot of lemon
and porridge, and no real peat blast
when at cask strength. With water:
it’s now that this one really
overtakes the Cadenhead and the others,
as it gets crisper, cleaner, smokier
and simply peatier. Nice farmy notes
(wet sheep, hay.) Okay, not a revelation
but it’s a nice Ardbeg. Mouth
(neat): once again, we’re close
to the Cadenhead’s but this
one is rather more expressive, sort
of better composed, with the holy
trinity well in place (peat, lemon,
pepper). Good balance despite the
relative ‘brutality’.
With water: once again, this is flawless
and most quaffable at roughly 45%
vol. Good stuff, reminding me a bit
of the Airigh Nam Beist (I got the
name correct, didn’t I!!) Finish:
long, clean, with just enough of all
worthy Arbbeggian ingredients (no
need to list them). Comments: this
one is very good. A clear and, to
tell you the truth, very easy winner.
And no, anything with the name Ardbeg
on it isn’t always stellar and
worth insulting prices. SGP:458
- 88 points.
April
14, 2009
TASTING
– THREE CAOL ILAS FROM THE
MID-1990s
Caol
Ila 10 yo 1996/2007 (46%, Chieftains,
Rum finish, casks #90361/90366, 2016
bottles)
There are more and more young (or
less young) peaty malts that are finished
in rum casks by the indies these days.
Is that because they also bottle rum
and hence have a lot of free rum casks
at hand? Colour: white wine. Nose:
easy smoky and mineral Caol Ila, the
rum being very discreet here. Quite
some peat and iodine as well as whiffs
of sparkling water/ginger tonic. Slight
mouldiness, hints of wet chalk, then
fresh mint and also lemon fizz. Lemon
balm. Probably not totally grandiose
but the fairly huge minerality is
pleasant. Mouth: round, sweet at first,
then ‘smoothly’ peaty
yet spicy and peppery, with a good
peatiness and some very, very discreet
rummy notes (not molasses). Good saltiness
as well and some faint notes of violets-flavoured
liquorice (Zan, if that rings a bell).
Not violet perfume! Very satisfying
version of a young Caol Ila. Finish:
not the longest but clean, with a
little mint this time. Would make
for some nice toothpaste ;-). Comments:
rather a classic, even if a little
simple. One to drink, maybe in Summer,
on a crushed ice and mint leaves (don’t
shoot!) For the best mojito? SGP:446
– 82 points.
Caol
Ila 13 yo 1995/2008 (59.1%, Alambic
Classique, cask #8102, 120 bottles)
From a refil hogshead. Colour:
white wine. Nose: a raw, even more
mineral and flinty version of Caol
Ila. Rather pungent and aggressive
without water, so let’s water
it down right away… With water:
it’s its youth that comes out,
with wagons of pears and a kind of
fruity smokiness that’s hard
to describe. Very simple spirit, but
very appealing spirit. Superb notes
of raspberries coming through after
a few seconds. Fruit eau-de-vie from
Islay? Mouth (neat): very strong,
extremely sweet, and tasting just
like some kind of a peated pear spirit
that just ran out of the still. Brutal!
With water: ah yes, now it became
absolutely superb… except that
it’s much more gentian spirit
than whisky. Amazing – did the
cask transit through the Alps? Finish:
long and majestic (even if rather
simple), under the ruling triumvirate
gentian- peat smoke- salt. Comments:
a little hard and young when undiluted
but sparkingly zesty when watered
down, especially on the palate. SGP:447
- 87 points.
Caol
Ila 12 yo 1995/2008 (60.8%, Blackadder
Raw Cask, cask #10017, 591 bottles)
We loved this baby when we first tried
it 100% blind at the MM Awards 2008.
Colour: white wine. Nose: once again,
a very mineral (and ashy) but also
very strong and harsh version. Added
notes of milk chocolate, unusual but
very pleasant. With water: top class
nose, one of the flintiest and ashiest
I could came across in the last months.
Ueberclean. Mouth (neat): a perfect
Caol Ila at very high strength, almost
drinkable without water (well, one
may be able to swallow a few drops).
Apple peelings, marine salt and fresh
limejuice – this will wake you
up, as sure as eggs is eggs. With
water: excellent and 100% Caol Ila
now. Rather close to the official
CS if memory serves. Finish: long,
ashy, peaty, vegetal (apple peeling,
walnuts), salty and spicy (green curry).
Comments: extremely good – as
good as it gets at just 12yo. Water
is obligatory. SGP:467 - 89
points.
STEPHANE
THE MAD MALT MIXOLOGIST
proposes his malt
cocktails for the
Springtime
TODAY:
"French
Romantic Glen"
Pour
into a shaker, with ice:
- 6 cl Glenlivet 15 yo french oak
40%
- 2 cl rose liqueur and 1 dash rose
syrup
- 1/2 lime juice
- 2 cl pink grapefruit juice
Shake then strain into a cocktail
glass decorated with one dwarf rose.
MUSIC
– Recommended
listening: a very rare treat, a
band that's got exactly the same
name as the whiskies we just had,
that is to say Caol Ila. So, here's
Japan's Caol
Ila (Steve Reich beware)
playing an 'Abstract' (from their
CD 'Abstracts - Music for CD Player',
Label IOS). Please buy Caol Ila's
music!
April
13, 2009
CONCERT
REVIEW by Nick Morgan
JONATHAN RICHMAN
The Bush Hall, Shepherds Bush, London,
March 28th 2009
You
see, Serge, the problem with all these
reviews and ratings is that sometimes
people take them seriously. Take the
case of the nice little (I’m
not going to tell you exactly what
it is, so let’s say, nice little
joint), quite possibly near to the
Bush Hall. It’s always had a
good reputation for its food, but
was recently on the receiving end
of a five-star review in an unnamed
national newspaper. Boy, can’t
you tell. At 7.00pm, when normally
you might see a few gigsters taking
protein before going into action and
a few lovestruck couples, refugees
from the cruel grasp of Blomfontein
Road, it’s packed. And these
aren’t your normal Shepherd’s
Bush crowd: rather it’s hoity-toity
Chiswick types, maybe even a few from
Notting Hill.
To make it worse we’ve got a
loud New York banker (OK, I apologise
for the tautology) with his joyless
partner next to us and who doesn’t
seem to have read the newspapers recently.
Unaware that he belongs to one of
the most despised professions on the
planet (and in the UK that’s
an understatement) he begins with
a moronic interrogation of the menu
before launching into a top volume
muse on the expensive places he has
holidayed in, and the expensive places
where he still has to go. Next he
catches sight of a colleague in the
place and bad mouths him remorselessly,
before smiling, waving and shouting
across the room “yeah –
we must all meet up for drinks”.
Finally, he pulls his red-hot Blackberry
from his pocket and urgently recites
the contents of a just-in email to
his companion, which describes the
intricacies of the sort of banking
deal most would now wish outlawed,
and what’s in it for him. Breathtaking,
but no doubt the sort of thing that
Jonathan
Richman would, on a good
day, manage to craft a few pointed
songs from. Leave the restaurant and
go back to the lonely financial zone,
I say.
Richman
is in London for four nights: Dingwalls,
the Borderline, the painfully groovy
Hoxton Square Bar and Kitchen and
tonight, the first of the visit, the
pretty little Bush Hall. He’s
on stage with a miked-up Spanish guitar,
dancing shoes, and drummer Tommy Larkins.
He’s not only shorn of his band,
the Modern Lovers, but his thick long
black locks are gone too. With close-cropped
hair, goatee beard, and the intense,
quizzical, almost pleading expression
with which he engages the audience,
he could be a Shakespearian actor
making a fairly good fist of Richard
II, rather than a rock and roll
singer. He’s grown up (he is
older than me after all) over the
years and his more recent material
marks a most reflective and thoughtful
view of the world. Not that his childlike,
naïve and very often, absurdist,
sense of humour has gone, simply it’s
now moderated by a distinct and sometimes
pungent, whiff of mortality.
He’s also gone Iberian in a
big way, so much of his new album,
¿A que venimos sino a caer?,
(which he helpfully translates for
us as ‘What did we come here
for but to fall?’ when he sings
the title song) is sung in Spanish,
and this set is infused with restrained
Latin rhythms (very good for the dancing)
and flamenco-style guitar. And when
it comes to playing, Richman can swap
marvellously between his Velvet Underground-inspired
punk glory days, sounding as though
he’s never played the guitar
before, and some wonderfully structured
and technically superb phrases and
riffs. In one of the best moments
of an outstanding performance, Richman
stopped dead during ‘In che
mondo viviamo’ (i.e. ‘What
a world we live in’) to berate
Barney the sound-engineer for allowing
the noisy air conditioning to be switched
on, and with equanimity restored,
played a beautiful flamenco riff.
His guitar, barely heard by the microphone,
soared through the silence. ‘That’
he said, vindicated and defiant, ‘is
what this hall was made for’.
Cue applause.
This
captivating set was nicely balanced
between recent and older, reworked
material. Songs like ‘You can
have a cell ‘phone’ and
‘When we refuse to suffer’
show an impatience with the modern
world (he doesn’t have a website
and I doubt he has a cell-phone);
this somewhat at odds with the sentiment
of ‘Road runner’ which
he rightly refused to sing despite
some requests although I suspect that
‘Cell phone’ might share
the same two chords as ‘Road
runner’. The tender ‘Le
printemps des amoureux est venu’
was sung in a French less accomplished
than his Spanish, and like almost
every other song afforded an opportunity
for Richman to place his guitar gently
in its case and dance for us, half
break-dancer, half shaman.
‘Affected
accent’ was a wonderfully humorous
look back at schooldays (“In
High School I was such a brat I spoke
with an accent I didn’t have”)
whilst ‘Let her go into the
darkness’ was a dark take on
a familiar boy-loses-girlfriend subject.
‘Dancing in a lesbian bar’
caused mayhem, and Vermeer got Richman’s
treatment, like many artists before
him, in ‘No one was like Vermeer’
(“Vermeer was eerie, Vermeer
was strange, he had a more modern
colour range”). He also sang
‘Pablo Picasso’, whom,
you may remember, “was never
called an asshole”.
And
talking of assholes – why is
it that some people just can’t
keep their mouths shut at gigs, and
are so selfish and rude that they
don’t even think for a minute
that it might disturb someone else?
When the worst offenders were asked,
not for the first time, if they could
lower their voices, the response was
so foul-mouthed and aggressive as
to make one wonder what people like
this could have been doing at a Jonathan
Richman concert, unless it was just
to provide a rhyme for Picasso. Don’t
they get it – or are they just
like our banker dining companion?
Well even the prize assholes did in
the end, and maybe it was just the
strength of Richman’s performance
that shut them up as he sang his final
song, ‘As my mother lay lying’,
his description of watching his mother
die. Not many artists would choose
to end a show with a song like this,
but in Richman’s case it was
a tour-de-force that brought a brilliant
show to a worthy end. - Nick Morgan
(photographs by Kate)
Glenfarclas
22 yo ‘Spirit of the Millenium’
(43%, OB, 2000 bottles, +/-2000)
Colour: gold. Nose: very expressive,
starting on apricot jam and honey,
with a very discreet smokiness in
the background. Gets then beautifully
fudgy and caramelly, with a growing
meatiness from the sherry casks –
but I wouldn’t say this is ‘very
sherried’ as such. Whiffs of
hay. Beautiful nose, very aromatic
and elegant, that’s got something
of Balvenie. Gets even more honeyed
after a few minutes. Mouth: indeed,
this is very round and creamy, all
on honey again, old sweet white wine,
sultanas and toffee/nougat. Maybe
not extremely complex, so it won’t
make it to 90, but bl**dy good for
sure. Gets a little salty. Finish:
very long, on buttered fudge and dark
toffee, a little drier now. Hints
of strawberry jam in the aftertaste.
Comments: mighty good and all pleasure.
SGP:631 - 89 points.
Glenfarclas
25 yo (43%, OB, Blue ceramic, mid
1990s)
Colour: pale gold. Nose: much drier
and less fruity/honeyed than the 22yo
at first nosing, with an unusual grassiness
and notes of cured ham. It’s
also rather flintier, mineral, and
even kind of metallic, which was certainly
unexpected – unless that comes
from he ceramic decanter. An unusually
dry and austere version of Glenfarclas.
Mouth: more ‘wideness’
than on the nose, its actually quite
close to the 22yo in style, only toned
down and a tad grassier, with also
a faint dustiness. Picks up steam
after a few minutes, getting spicier
(quite some pepper) and maltier. Finish:
longer than expected, rather malty
and coffee-ish. Comments: a nose that’s
a little ‘undecided’ but
the palate is very nice, with good
body. SGP:441 – 84 points.
Glenfarclas
30 yo (43%, OB, Bottled +/- 2008)
I’ve always found the ‘30’
to be rather inconsistent, ranging
from very high marks (90) to ‘good’
ones (84) depending on the batches.
Colour: amber. Nose: it’s got
more to say than the 25 for sure,
starting on a lot of raisins and notes
of cognac, with a little camphor and
eucalyptus. Gets then more resinous
and raisiny (sultanas) but it does
not quite reach the 22yo’s sultriness.
Notes of pine needles, lovage (and
Maggi!), liquorice allsorts and fresh
putty. I must say this is much more
to my liking than when I first tried
this recent batch. Mouth: what’s
rather obvious here is that there’s
much more wood and spices than in
the 22 and 25, with a rather big ‘tannicity’
(tea, liquorice wood) and then notes
of prunes. Just like the 22, it gets
then rather salty, with even hints
of black olives. That’s fun!
Finish: long, going on in the same
vein. And always these black olives!
Comments: I really missed this one
when I first tried it but it grew
on me – and I adore black olives!
SGP:451 - 89 points.
Glenfarclas
21 yo (104°proof US, OB, Grant
Bonding Co, USA, late 1960's)
‘A princely whisky for a royal
occasion.’ Colour: gold. Nose:
amazing! Imagine a bigger smokiness
than in most Glenfarclas, coating
fruitcakes and thousands of minuscule
micro-aromas that I wouldn’t
list here. Call the anti-maltoporn
brigade! A myriadic whisky (wot?)
Mouth: extraordinarily good, assertive,
hugely elegant and complex, everything
being very perfect. Probably less
‘Speyside’ than one would
have imagined, and more of an Islander.
Imagine a vatting of the best Highland
Parks and Springbanks… Finish:
as long as Der Ring des Nibelungen
but much more entertaining. And saltier.
Comments: mantraic (how stoopid is
that?) SGP:662 - 94 points.
Glenfarclas
1979/2003 ‘Edition #9 Alexander
Graham Bell’ (54%, OB, 1200
bottles)
Colour: amber. Nose: a more spirity
30yo, maybe a tad grassier and meatier
as well (chicken broth, ham). Other
than that it lacks a bit of amplitude
so to speak, let’s try to wake
it up with water. With water: it does
improve indeed but stays a little
shy. Beef bouillon, butterscotch and
apple compote. Mouth (neat): punchy
but not exactly rich, maybe a little
monodimensional (orange marmalade.)
Once again, let’s add water.
With water: yes it improves once again,
but once again that isn’t quite
enough. Malty and vanilled, and now
more sherried. Now, this one had the
death seat after the stupendous old
21, we’ll try to taste it again
another time. Finish: rather long,
more vanilled and toffee-ish. Comments:
let’s be fair, this is very
good whisky. It’s just that
there are many better Glenfarclas,
as we could find out once again.
SGP:431 – 82 points.
April
11, 2009
MALTERNATIVES
– NINETEEN ‘REGULAR’
RUMS
Sometimes we feel the urge to go see
what happens ‘somewhere else’.
This (spring)time it’s going
to be 19 rums from various countries
but warning, we know next to nothing
about rums, so please take our notes
with even more salt than usual. Moreover,
we don’t feel like issuing ratings
on a 100-scale here so let’s
only use 5-point categories if you
don't mind (55, 60, 65, 70…)
RUM
TASTING
TWO CARIBBEANS
Angostura
1919 (40%, OB, Trinidad)
This famous rum is entirely distilled
in column stills from molasses, the
youngest ‘component’ in
the vatting being 8 years old. Globally,
it appears that Trinidad produces
rather light rums. Colour: gold. Nose:
extremely soft, extremely round and
extremely sweet like banana liqueur.
Then vanilla cake and plain caramel,
with hints of nougat. It smells like
a ready-made cocktail, really. Explosively
aromatic but too smooth for my taste.
Mouth: good attack, round and extremely
sweet (tankers of banana liqueur)
then light honey and roasted hazelnuts.
Gets really light-bodied after the
attack, with a thin middle. Hints
of coconut milk. Finish: short but
pleasantly sweet and clean. Comments:
this on ice under a hot sun…
My, that would be a massacre. Good
engineered drink. SGP:630
- 70 points.
Barbancourt
4yo *** (40%, OB, Haiti)
Haiti bears French tradition and makes
rum the way the French islands make
it, that is to say mainly double-distilled
in pot stills. What’s more,
Barbancourt is entirely matured in
French Limousin oak. Colour: gold.
Nose: a little harsher than the Angostura,
and less talkative as well. Sort of
more ‘serious’ and restrained.
Vanilla, ginger liqueur, slight grassiness
and a few spices (cloves and cinnamon).
Keeps keeping quiet for a long time…
Forever? Mouth: once again this is
more serious and much less ‘engineered’,
and rather closer to malt whisky.
Actually, it’s got a slight
maltiness and also quite a lot of
salt. The Atlantic again? ;-) Other
than that this rum is rather grassy.
A little white pepper as well and
finally crystallised oranges. Finish:
medium long, with a welcomed aftertaste
on sugarcane. Comments: good dram.
I mean, glass. Rather complex. SGP:441
– 75 points.
RUM
TASTING
THE FRENCH CARRIBEANS
Trois
Rivières 3yo Cuvée du
Moulin (40%, OB, France/La Martinique)
The original distillery was founded
around 1660! Trois Rivières
is a name that’s often mentioned
among whisky lovers for being of high
quality. Let’s see if the buzz
is right. Colour: full gold. Nose:
right, despite being only 3 years
old, this has strictly nothing to
do with both the Angostura and the
Barbancourt. Emphatically vanilled,
honeyed and spicy at first nosing,
getting then rather minty and herbal
(straight camphor and eucalyptus)
and displaying even faint coastal
notes, it is simply superb. Keeps
developing for a long time but more
on ripe strawberries and other red
fruits. Mouth: right, the palate couldn’t
match the nose, obviously (would have
been a miracle). We’re rather
in presence of a sweet, easy, fudgy
and raisiny spirit that very, very
easy to swallow. We won’t complain.
Finish: medium long, even more on
raisins, with just hints of candy
sugar. Comments: the nose is fab,
even if maybe a tad too flattering.
SGP:530 - 80 points.
Saint-Etienne
VO (42%, OB, France/La Martinique)
A blend of rums from 3 to 5 years
of age. Colour: gold. Nose: less extravagant
than the Trois Rivières, this
one starts more on leather and wood
(polish), develops more on dried bananas
and gets finally even more ‘mentholated’.
Once again, it’s excellent rum
on the nose. Gets seriously grassier
over time. Mouth: well, it seems that
it’s got what the Trois Rivières
didn’t have on the palate. Bigger,
wilder, much more herbal (verbena,
thyme tea) and with a more obvious
woodiness. All that gets maybe a little
rough and disorganised after a while
but it’s still pretty excellent.
A ‘Highlander’ of rum?
Finish: rather long, more on bananas
flambéed and liquorice. Comments:
impossible to tell you which Martiniquais
I liked best. Tie! SGP:441
- 80 points.
Karukera
Reserve Spéciale (42%, OB,
France/La Guadeloupe)
A blend of rums of more than five
years of age. Colour: gold. Nose:
we’re much closer to spices
and resins here. Very pleasant notes
of cloves, dried ginger and straight
pine resin, with quite a load of freshly
ground pepper that dominates ‘the
end’ together with whiffs of
hot caramelised apple pie. Another
rather superb nose. Mouth: starts
much more flavourful than both Martiniquais
but maybe also too exuberantly fruity.
Imagine a fruit juice cocktail into
which you’d have poured, well,
rum… And Turkish delights, and
tinned litchis, and pineapples…
To a malt drinker this may be too
easy. Aren’t all malt drinkers
a tad masochistic? Finish: rather
long, a tad less fruity now, the spices
gaining control over it. Comments:
spectacular rum, extremely pleasant
and easy to savour. SGP:731
- 80 points.
RUM
TASTING
TWO
SOUTH AMERICAN SOLERA RUMS
Demerara
Solera N°14 (40%, Rum Nation,
Guyana)
Demeraras are said to be quite heavy
so maybe I should have started with
the Peruvian instead but the latter
comes from an older solera so it ought
to be much subtler. Right, right…
Colour: amber. Nose: this is very
unusual! It starts boldly and assertively
on all things ‘rum’ (sugarcane,
dried bananas, soft spices and so
on) but really loses steam after a
few seconds, which was certainly unexpected.
What was also unexpected were the
very nice notes of ripe kiwis and
fresh oranges. Picks up steam again
after five minutes, much more on dark
raisins, strong honey and candy sugar
but that was expected. A ‘roller
coaster’ nose. Mouth: certainly
the thickest and the fattest so far.
Huge, concentrated, maybe a tad cloying
to the average malt drinker (which
I am as you may know) because of its
mega-huge sweetness and fruitiness…
As thick as a liqueur in fact. Let’s
say banana liqueur with added orange
blossom honey and pure sugarcane syrup.
Finish: long but still extremely sweet
and candied. Comments: I liked the
nose a lot but the palate is too unbalanced
for my taste. SGP:820 –
70 points.
Cartavio
12 yo Solera (40%, OB, Peru)
This one comes from a solera that
dates back to 1929! 1929? Is it, quite
appropriately, rum for recessionistas?
Now, it doesn’t seem that Peru
is a famous rum nation but I’m
probably totally wrong. Colour: full
gold. Nose: have you ever smelled
a full bunch of overripe bananas?
Add to that dried figs and dates plus
hints of orange blossom and you’ve
got it, even if this one is actually
much subtler than you may think after
these very poor tasting notes. Mouth:
this is certainly less sweet, jammy
and thick than the Demerara but once
again, it starts all on dried and
overripe bananas. Is this distilled
bananas? The good news is that there
are also various other very nice flavours,
such as cloves, bitter chocolate,
mocha, cough drops, orange marmalade…
In other words, a fine palate. Finish:
medium long and more candied. Comments:
not an absolute wonder methinks but
it’s certainly more elegant
than the Falstaffian Demerara. SGP:620
- 75 points.
RUM
TASTING
TWO
VENEZUELANS
Diplomatico
Reserva (40%, OB, Venezuela)
This brand is fairly recent but has
been very successful since its beginnings.
Venezuela seems to be a huge producer
of aged rums… Colour: dark amber.
Nose: all on caramel and butterscotch
toffee. Imagine Werther’s Original
liqueur, this is it. Monodimensional?
Maybe but it’s a rather nice
dimension… Mouth: caramel again.
I mean, full caramel then only hints
of prunes. Extremely sweet, going
on with mega-ultra-extra huge notes
of vanilla. Once again, this is more
a liqueur than a spirit and really
calls for a few ice cubes. Finish:
rather long but extremely thickish.
Comments: it seems impossible that
somebody could make this by putting
straight spirit into regular oak.
Somebody else must have added ‘something’.
SGP:810 – 60 points.
Ocumare
12yo Golden Reserve (40%, Venezuela)
Made from canes that grow in the Amazon.
Fancy packaging! Colour: very dark
amber. Nose: once again, this is very
caramelly but less so than the Diplomatico
on the nose. Still, we’re very
‘Demerara’ here, even
more so than Demeraras it seems. A
little more spices and hints of sugarcanes
as well as sandalwood. Very aromatic!
Mouth: it’s a true relief after
the monstrous Diplomatico (so much
for Hugo Rafael Chávez!) Still
very thick and rich and sweetish but
better balanced, with rather nice
notes of coffee liqueur. Oak-aged
Kahlúa? Finish: long, candied,
coffeeish… But a tad cloying
I must say. Comments: it’s really
a matter of taste and I’m sure
some people must like these heavy
Venezuelans, but as a lover of old-skool
Highlanders, I’d say both are
way too far from my references. The
Carribeans really rule so far! SGP:720
- 65 points.
RUM
TASTING
CENTRAL AMERICA
Macollo
Black 12 yo (38%, OB, Mexico)
This one is organic and comes from
Mexico’s Jalisco state. Of course
they also have a red label ;-). Colour:
gold. Nose: it’s a much grassier
and more austere rum, but also one
that’s much more elegant than
the Venezuelans, and pleasantly ‘distant’?
Unexpected hints of marc de Bourgogne,
olive oil and then more common notes
of banana skin. Nice and dry. Mouth:
soft, smooth and much, much sweeter
and caramelised than on the nose.
Molasses, candy sugar, banana liqueur
and café latte, with a little
Chinese anise in the background. Not
unpleasant! Finish: rather short but
clean, half caramelly, half grassy.
Comments: a pleasant drink. Funny
how different nose and palate were.
SGP:441 - 70 points.
Mombacho
8yo (40%, OB, Nicaragua)
A merchant’s brand of very high
reputation (it seems). Colour: dark
gold. Nose: this one is much more
on coffee and bitter chocolate, with
hints of flour. But nutshell: all
things coffee-ish. Of course, it’ll
all come down to whether you like
coffee or not. Mouth: a mix of coffee
liqueur and Cointreau with dark chocolate.
Slightly soapy for a while, then quite
a lot of burnt sugar. Finish: shortish
and a little more chocolaty but these
brunt notes do remain. Comments: a
tad rough and too much on burnt sugar
for my taste (you may call that bitter
caramel). The nose was straighter.
SGP:530 - 65 points.
Don
José-Pesé 1997/2007
(46%, Renegade Rum Company, Panama,
Port finish, 1,390 bottles)
So, not only whiskies are finished
these days! Colour: gold. Nose: extremely
strange! We’re far from all
the rums we already had, and actually
closer to malt whisky (not only because
this is from a Scottish bottler),
like, guess what, a rum-finished whisky!
Something like a young Springbank…
Notes of crystallised oranges, tea,
blackcurrant buds... It’s only
after quite some time that a plainer
‘rumminess’ comes through
(overripe bananas and candy sugar).
A little mint. Certainly more complex
than many ‘100% rum’.
Mouth: very, very, very strange…
A drink that really causes me a lot
of trouble… Grass, resin, banana
skin (like when you bite into an unopened
banana), malt whisky (did the Port
cask contain malt whisky before it
was used for this rum?)… Straight
oak as well. Finish: long and more
on wood. Comments: again, I couldn’t
quite follow this one, I’m lacking
references. SGP:451 - 70 points.
RUM
TASTING
THE
INDIAN OCEAN
Savanna
5 yo (43%, OB, France/La Réunion)
This one comes from the northeast
of the beautiful island of La Réunion.
Colour: pale gold. Nose: right, this
is much, much cleaner than most of
the rums that we tried before, which
doesn’t mean it’s simple
stuff. Much more on tropical fruits
(bananas ‘of course’ but
also pineapples and mangos), then
ripe strawberries, then much bigger
notes of straight vanilla pods and
finally hints of wood varnish. Very
pleasant and certainly flawless. Mouth:
good, sweet, candied but maybe a little
too simple now. Crystallised pineapples
and very sweet liquorice. Lacks dimension
if you see what I mean, but otherwise
it’s flawless. Finish: medium
long, a little more honeyed. Comments:
good, clean, easy rum. I liked the
nose better than the palate. SGP:530
– 75 points.
Savanna
7 yo (43%, OB, France/La Réunion)
Colour: gold. Nose: ah, yes! Now we’re
talking! We’re more or less
in the same class as the Trois Rivières
but even higher. Emphatic, extremely
aromatic but certainly not heavy,
with wonderful oaky notes, sandalwood,
incense, cedar wood (cigar box), liquorice,
figs, Mirabelle jam and gingerbread
(huge). Also faint whiffs of fruity
cheese (young comté) and finally
immense notes of pureed black olives.
Great stuff, pleasantly whacky (sort
of)! Mouth: excellent! Warming, very
‘tropical’, complex, superbly
bittersweet. Olives again, date spirit,
figs liqueur (just hints, not the
very cloying stuff), various honeys
and, I don’t know why, something
that reminds me of a young Highland
Park. Ah, we’re not in terra
incognita anymore! ;-) Finish: long
and on something fabulous my dear
wife use to prepare: orange salad
seasoned with honey and olive oil).
Comments: my fav of the flight so
far. Very entertaining. SGP:552
- 85 points.
Savanna
Grand Arôme Vieux 2001 (46%,
OB, France/La Réunion)
Colour: gold. Nose: more classic and
closer to an older and more mature
3yo than to the rather amazing 7 but
it’s as complex, just less ‘whacky’.
The black olives are well here but
really toned down (it’s maybe
rather green olives), other that that
we have the usual ripe bananas, pineapple
liqueur, papayas and very obvious
notes of quince jam, then straight
sugar cane, Armagnac-soaked raisins
and whiffs of resiny wine (Retsina).
Mouth: very good attack but there’s
much, much more straight oak than
in the 7yo. Notes of olives again,
capers, a little salt (tinned anchovies?)
and overripe bananas. Rougher than
the 7, with a ‘greenness’
that grows bigger and bigger. More
capers, more olives… And even
pickled gherkins. Finish: long and
even more on olives – and maybe
even kippers plus bitter oranges.
Comments: a spectacular spirit but
it’s probably not for the fainthearted.
The Laphroaig of the rum world? SGP:371
- 80 points.
Dzama
3yo (52%, OB, Madagascar)
From the north of the island. La Maison
du Whisky says that its floral notes
come from the fact that there are
ylang-ylang plants next to the canes.
Let’s check that… (but
what the hell do ylang-ylang flowers
smell like?) Colour: gold. Nose: oh,
this is totally different from the
Savannas, even from the gentle 3yo,
for it’s all on crystallised
kumquats, orange zests and orange
blossom water, with maybe just hints
of geraniums and lilies. It’s
simple but it’s rather wonderful.
Mouth: is this relabelled Grand-Marnier?
Or did John Glaser’s very good
Orangerie? John, if you read this,
try to put your hands on a bottle
of this, you’ll find it very,
err, funny. An amazing product, but
is it really possible to make an orange
liqueur just by distilling sugarcanes?
An alchemist’s stuff…
Finish: long, simple but wonderfully
orangey. Comments: this is a surprise.
It’s very good stuff and I say
hauts les coeurs, Madagascar! SGP:721
- 80 points.
RUM
TASTING
OLDER
ONES FROM THE CARIBBEANS
Matusalem
15 yo Gran Reserva Solera (40%, OB,
Dominican Republic)
A brand that’s got a long and
troubled history as it used to be
in Cuba before Fidel. According to
Dave Broom, it’s actually a
blend of various Caribbean origins.
Colour: deep gold. Nose: much, much
less expressive than the four ‘Indians’
that we just had, rather subdued and
mostly on roasted nuts and light fudge
at first nosing. Slowly takes off
after a moment, with more notes of
figs and old wood and a faint meatiness
that we didn’t get in any of
the other rums. Globally, a lightness
that reminds me of Glenfiddich’s
Solera 15yo – and it isn’t
only the name. ‘Nice’
and pretty harmless. Mouth: wood,
caramel, vanilla and orange liqueur
with a little mint. Rather simple
when compared with the nose, good
but lacking character. Gets a little
too sweet and sugary. Strawberry drops?
Finish: rather long but a little too
caramelly. ‘Simple’ honey
and chocolate cake. It’s only
in the aftertaste that very pleasant
notes of cane sugar do develop –
a bit too late. Comments: good but
sort of commercial. What a middle-range
blend is to whisky. SGP:431
– 75 points.
Mount
Gay Extra Old (43%, OB, Barbados)
This one should be roughly 17 years
old as I understand it. Colour: amber.
Nose: certainly the most complex of
them all at first nosing, but it isn’t
really bold. An interesting maltiness,
then whiffs of burnt wood, wood smoke,
cigar box and dark honey (also beeswax)
as well as notes of orange marmalade
and tamarind. Gets more and more complex,
with more leathery notes and hints
of cold tea. Also strawberry ganache
but it’s globally drier than
the Matusalem – and a tad less
easy/commercial. Mouth: yes! Sure
there may be a little too much oak
but the whole is perfectly concentrated,
rich, nutty and minty. Aniseed, eucalyptus
drops, sugared mocha, a little salt,
bitter oranges and notes of oloroso
sherry (what, sherry casks?) Finish:
long, ‘malty’, liquoricy.
Comments: we aren’t too far
from some sherried malts here. Something
of Aberlour? Just to give you an indication…
Much bigger than the slightly disappointing
Matusalem for sure. SGP:441
- 80 points.
CONCLUSIONS
- To be honest, I’ve
been a little disappointed with some
of these rums, even if none was meant
to be a true premium product. Well
I guess a rum maniac who would have
tried almost only cheapo young malt
whiskies or blends would have been
disappointed as well… Anyway,
these rums were maybe more ‘monodimensional’
than most traditional malt whiskies
(banana, coffee, vanilla, caramel)
and a little less varied as well,
but that may come from raw materials
that are more expressive than our
dear barley. What’s more, rums
seem to mature much quicker than whiskies.
So, that’s it with our rummy
adventures this year as we probably
won’t try any other ones before
the end of 2009, except if we manage
to put our hands on a few interesting
samples. Oh, one last piece of advice:
get a bottle of Savanna 7yo, that
one really stood out! As for books,
Dave Broom's book 'Rum' (Mitchell
Beazley) is truly excellent.
BONUS
- CRAZY RUM ADS for Matusalem (poor
Fidel!)
Top:
'Fidel's tradition of long speeches
began in 59, when he had to explain
to Cubans why he expelled their best
rum'.
Bottom: 'The Caribbean has never
seen a pirate like Fidel. He stole
an island and threw the treasure away'.
Well, maybe Fidel simply knew a lot
about rum...
MUSIC
– Recommended
listening: we already posted quite
some jazz and blues violin on WF
(Lockwood, Grappelli, Ponty, Papa
John Creach, Joe Venuti and others...)
but I think we never posted anything
by the great Don
'Sugar Cane' Harris,
who was in Zappa's band before Ponty
(on Weasels and Chunga) and once
recorded a 'violin summit' with
him and a few others. Let's repair
that and listen to his marvelous
Carlsbad, recorded in 1975 (LP Keyzop).
Please buy the great man's music!
April
9, 2009
TASTING
– FIVE BANFF
Now
that the youngest possible bottlings
are more than 25 years of age, as
the distillery was closed in 1983,
Banff is getting rarer and rarer.
Maybe this 5-session will be the last
‘big one’ we’ll
ever manage to do with Banffs –
sob!
Banff
1974/1998 (40%, Gordon & MacPhail,
Connoisseur's Choice)
Colour: pale gold. Nose: starts rather
big and aromatic on a very ‘idiosyncratic’
mix of orange juice, mustard and coal,
but gets then a little drier and dustier,
with some slightly stale/sourish notes
(old white wine). Whiffs of farmyard
after the rain, apple juice, then
more coal, stove, soot… Old
style for sure, unlike any ‘current’
whisky. Mouth: sweeter and a tad rounder,
a good attack on notes of mead and
arak, figs, prunes and then something
more cardboardy and slightly tea-ish.
A little more pepper too, but the
palate is a little more easy-easy
than the nose. Finish: medium long,
clean, on figs and café latte.
Not much ‘Banffness’ here.
Comments: a good dram, easily drinkable
but not lacking character, even if
Banff is usually more extreme. SGP:342
- 83 points.
Banff
32 yo 1974/2007 (47.8%, Douglas Laing,
OMC, ref 3521, 272 bottles)
Colour: straw. Nose: once again, this
is very different, and big time, for
it starts on a full plate of oysters,
including lemon and seaweed, and develops
more towards wet gravel and earth,
soot, saltpetre, tonic water, wet
stones and iron (gun, car engine).
And once a gain, these typical mustardy
notes flying around, and then more
seashells (clams?). A style of its
own, very beautiful. Mouth: exceptional,
nervous, rich, concentrated, with
tons of citrus fruits, spices and
these oily tones that are so unusual.
Cinchona, bitter oranges, pepper,
sweet mustard (the one they sometimes
use on the bratwursts ;-)), tangerine
liqueur, citrons, coriander…
A wonderful palate, very assertive,
the antithesis of many modern easy-easy
doped malts. Finish: very long, wonderfully
clean, citrusy, phenolic, spicy (a
lot of coriander left), with some
cloves… Comments: state of the
art old malt. Shall we cry?
SGP:463 - 91 points (and
thanks, Alain.)
Banff
1975/2008 (48.3%, Jack Wieber, The
Cross Hill, 256 bottles)
Colour: white wine. Nose: it seems
that there’s much more oak influence
here, as we’re starting on rather
big whiffs of newly sawn wood, vanilla,
ginger (or speculoos), then café
latte, caramel and nutmeg (huge notes.)
Banff’s markers aren’t
quite there yet but the whole is pretty
nice, even if it smells a bit like
some malt that would have been re-racked
in new oak or fresh bourbon. It’s
only after a few minutes that whiffs
of oysters and horseradish manage
to come through. Mouth: rich and creamy,
rather closer to the OMC for a while
(but with more spices and pepper),
the rather heavy oakiness taking control
after the attack, with something a
little dry and tea-ish plus vanilla
and a lot of ginger. Gets better once
all that has mingled a bit, with more
fruits (fresh oranges) and a more
obvious ‘Banfness’ that
shines through. You got it, mustard!
A little peat too. Finish: long, still
nervous, not too oaky (phew!) and
spicy. Peppered apricots? Comments:
interesting how the heavy oakiness
goes and comes in this one. Maybe
not the best Banff ever in my view
– and it had the death seat
after the Douglas Laing - but there
are less and less opportunities to
get a nice newly bottled one, so…
SGP:452 - 85 points.
Banff
29 yo 1976/2006 (52%, Cadenhead's,
bourbon hogshead, 228 bottles)
Colour: pale gold. Nose: we’re
even more on new oak than with the
Cross Hill here, but there’s
also a very pleasant fruitiness that
we didn’t quite get in the siblings.
Apple pie, ripe plums with cinnamon,
something farmy, hay, white pepper…
And once again these mustardy notes
in the background. A rather round,
but very pleasant Banff again. More
a Banff ‘de salon’? Mouth:
we’re closer to the DL now,
with this nervous, compact and focused
attack on fruits and spices. Bitter
oranges, cloves, pepper, cinchona,
sweet mustard and… more pepper.
Let’s see what happens with
water: more of the same actually,
but it does get rounder indeed, with
the very same notes of ripe plums
and raisins that we had on the nose.
Excellent. Finish: medium long, with
more oak and more spices. And sweet
mustard, really. Comments: another
excellent Banff, punto basta. Maybe
a bit easier to tame than others.
SGP:552 - 89 points.
Banff
24 yo 1976/2001 (55.8%, Signatory,
cask #2251, 284 bottles)
Colour: Nose: pale gold. Mouth: ho-ho,
this one is totally different, and
truly unlike any other malt whisky.
Imagine some new rubber boots, a lot
of Dijon mustard, a lot of motor oil,
a lot of bitter rocket salad, quite
some apple peelings, asparagus peelings,
green tea, plain grass, even wasabi,
pepper… And not even one single
fruity touch. In other words, this
one is extremely grassy and austere,
hence quite spectacular in its own
genre. With water: same, with more
peat and even more pepper. Unexpectedly
Taliskerish, if I may dare to say
so. Mouth (neat): aaah yes, this is
something. Wonderful bitterness, grassy,
not aggressive but quite, resinous,
liquoricy, peaty and phenolic/smoky,
lemony… This is big whisky,
maybe a tad raw but so satisfying
and ‘anti-commercial!’
(wot?) With water: and the fruits
do kick in now. Oranges, bananas,
ripe apples, even blueberries…
How excellent! Finish: giddy-up! Comments:
just great. Sometimes we feel that
some rants about closed distilleries
are very vain, as many did not really
make stellar malts, but Banff IS a
sad loss. We’ll probably upgrade
it from third to second grand cru
classé next time we’ll
revise our ‘funny’ ranking.
SGP:573 - 91 points(and thanks, Konstantin.)
MUSIC
– Recommended
listening: Vancouver's Cameron
Latimer - Empty Saddle
(from his CD Fallen Apart). Please
buy Cameron Latimer's music!
April
8, 2009
TASTING
– FOUR RECENT OFFICIAL BENRIACHS
Benriach
31 yo 1977/2008 (51.3%, OB, hogshead,
cask #7186, 212 bottles)
Colour: pale gold. Nose: a typical
‘new’ Benriach, starting
on full baskets of fresh fruits (tangerines
and bananas) and going on with hints
of fresh mint (spearmint), vanilla
custard and then soft spices such
as cinnamon and nutmeg. Gets finally
a tad more camphory, with also whiffs
of eucalyptus and just hints of fresh
oak. A classic, very fresh and clean
yet complex. Returns on praline and
nougat. Mouth: rich and fresh at the
attack, but the oak strikes harder
than on the nose, with quite some
overinfused green tea, then butter
and marzipan. Banana skin, hints of
plum spirit. Also hotter than on the
nose, let’s add water: that
did not make it less oaky, rather
grassier. Finish: long, half grassy,
half fruity, with a ‘greenness’
from the wood. Comments: beautiful
nose but the palate is maybe a little
less convincing. SGP:651 -
87 points.
Benriach
32 yo 1976/2008 (50.3%, OB, hogshead,
cask #2014, 271 bottles)
Colour: pale gold. Nose: there’s
more happening in this one than in
the 1977, even if the overall profile
is rather similar. Emphatically fruity
(same notes of tangerines and bananas
but also passion fruits and mangos
here), more herbs as well (dill, mint,
coriander) and whiffs of fresh pastries,
orange blossom and touches of leather.
This one is exceptionally aromatic
but never ‘heavy’. A wonderful
cask! Mouth: superb attack! Wonderfully
citrusy (lemon marmalade, kumquats,
tangerine liqueur), going on with
notes of peppermint and coriander
(even a little savory), with the spices
soon to kick in (curry, Szechuan pepper).
Constantly fresh and lemony. With
water (even if water is probably not
obligatory here): a little more on
orange zests. Exceptionally good.
Finish: long, fresh, superbly fruity,
even if less exuberant than at the
attack. That’s good news actually,
otherwise it would have been a little
tiresome ;-). Comments: one of these
great old Benriachs, enough said.
SGP:641 – 92 points.
Benriach
19 yo 1988/2008 (53.6%, OB, Virgin
American oak, cask #4020, 296 bottles)
Colour: gold. Nose: this one is, as
expected, extremely oaky and ‘modern’,
starting on orange peel and nutmeg,
then quite some ginger, coconut and
vanilla and finally mega-huge notes
of fresh orange juice. Also a little
nutmeg. More straight oak coming through
after that (wet sawdust) as well as
even more vanilla. The good news is
that it never gets ‘too much’,
which is rather incredible considering
it was in fresh oak all along. Rather
simpler than the 1976/1977, though.
Mouth: rich, creamy, oily, starting
all on these very gingery/nutmeggy
notes that one can find in most ‘oak-made’
Glenmorangies (Artisan and the likes.)
That gives it a very ‘modern’
taste that should appeal to many malt
lovers, but I must say I prefer more
natural Benriachs, even if this is
perfectly made. Goes on and on with
a lot of vanilla, bitter oranges and
tinned pineapples. With water: more
nutmeg, sign of a rather talkative
oak. Finish: long, clean and unexpectedly
balanced. Benriach’s fruitiness
works well with the new oak here and
leaves your mouth fresh as a baby’s.
Comments: again, not a style that
I cherish but I must say this is perfectly
made. Quite spectacular. SGP:652
– 87 points.
Benriach
28 yo 1979/2008 (51.2%, OB, lightly
peated, bourbon barrel, cask #10771,
149 bottles)
Colour: white wine. Nose: a very ‘funny’
start on ancient roses, muscat and
litchis, very ‘gewurztraminer’
(very obvious). Settles down a bit
after that, getting a little less
exuberant and more on vanilla and
soft spices, but there’s also
a return on both kiwis and cut grass.
This one is highly entertaining but
we get very little peat. Mouth: it’s
amazing how the palate is in the keeping
with the nose, for it’s all
on gewürztraminer again. That
is to say litchis, Turkish delights,
ripe strawberries and a fresh spiciness
that gathers ginger, cloves, star
anise and cardamom. Quite spectacular
and unlike any other malt whisky,
let alone a Benriach. Once again,
very little peat. With water: it IS
gewürztraminer. More muscatty
notes as well. Finish: long and all
on marc de gewürztraminer. Not
kidding! Comments: very good and very
unusual, this cask must have had a
strange story. No obvious peat that
I can get, or maybe it’s the
peat that gave this one its funny
‘gewurztraminerality’?
SGP:731 - 86 points.
PETE
McPEAT AND JACK WASHBACK
MUSIC
– Recommended
listening: The
Woodsmen and their I
Been Rich All My Life (that's on Frisco
Frisco). Please buy the Woodsmen's
music... Well, actually, they're giving
it away on their website! ('we
figured we'd never make it big time,
so we kept our day jobs and instead
of touring, recorded albums that we
paid for ourselves. does it make any
sense? no.')
April
7, 2009
TASTING
– THREE OLD WILLETT
We’ve
tried very little Bourbons or other
American whiskeys so far (at least
‘seriously’), so let’s
start to fix that while Barack Obama
is in Strasbourg (at time of writing),
with three rare spirits from the old
Willett Distillery in Bardstown, Kentucky.
The old Willett Distillery stopped
distilling in 1984, you may read the
whole story there.
We’ll try more American whiskeys,
including by Willett, in the near
future.
Vintage
Bourbon 1983/2000 (43%, OB, Bourbon,
batch #BROI.27)
Colour: amber. Nose: starts fresh
and quite fragrant, on vanilla pods
and whiffs of bananas flambéed
as well as quite some heather honey,
orange marmalade and nougat. Something
that reminds me of Jamaican rum rather
than malt whisky, the balance being
perfect here. A classy nose for sure,
that keeps developing towards a faint
‘malty meatiness’ that
I hadn’t expected. Mint sauce
and beef bouillon. High standards.
Mouth: big and assertive at just 43%
vol., maybe a little too drying just
at the attack (a lot of cinnamon and
white pepper, flour), but the development
is very nice, sweet and rounded, with
something like honey sauce, quite
some vanilla, hints of coconut milk
and just some faint notes of bubblegum
and marshmallows that I like a little
less, especially since they’re
a little strange when combined with
the spicy oakiness. Other than that,
this is very fine whiskey. Finish:
medium long, slightly dusty but the
rich honeyness and the spices work
perfectly well together. Orange liqueur
in the aftertaste. Comments: very
pleasant and highly drinkable, far
from the low-standard heavy selling
brands. SGP:641 – 85
points.
Willett
22 yo 1984 'Family Estate' (68.35%,
OB, Kentucky rye, for Ed Ledger, barrel
#8, 216 bottles)
This one comes from the very last
batches made at the distillery. Colour:
deep amber. Nose: at first nosing,
it’s close to the 1983 as far
as the profile is concerned, only
a little more caramelly and, of course,
hot, even if it’s easily noseable
at such high strength. Develops more
on ‘good’ varnish, old
precious wood (huge notes of thuja
wood), sultanas, prunes and beef jerky,
with also notes of banana liqueur.
Very superb and not assaulting at
almost 70% vol. With water (down to
+/-45% vol.): exceptional!!! Loads
of dried fruits (dates, bananas…),
fine herbs (verbena, lemon balm…),
precious oils (linseed, turpentine…)
and various kinds of resinous substances
(putty, camphor balm, propolis). The
spiciness is quite fabulous and very
‘wide’. Better stop here
if we want to avoid maltoporn. I mean,
rye-o-porn. Mouth (neat): very strong
but so smooth… Fantastic spices
and honey coating caramelised fruits.
With water: the oak is more obvious
but the fruitiness is so big that
the whole is still beautifully balanced.
Ripe strawberries and pineapples,
cardamom, cloves, gingerbread, bananas,
cane sugar, chocolate… And a
slight earthiness that makes it even
more beautiful. Finish: maybe not
eternal but clean, a little more roasted,
with a funny strawberries and mushrooms
combo in the aftertaste (faint mouldiness).
Comments: I wouldn’t say this
was a surprise, as these old ryes
by Willett’s have quite a reputation,
but still… Too bad there is
so little of this in the market. SGP:752
- 92 points.
Willett
24 yo 1984 'Family Estate' (69.4%,
OB, Kentucky rye, for Glen Fahrn,
barrel #14, 218 bottles)
This one comes from the very last
cask from the Willett Distillery,
there won’t be any more of this.
Colour: deep amber. Nose: this baby
starts a little drier than cask #8,
rather less on sultanas and prunes
and more on leather and roasted chestnuts,
with also a little more spices from
the wood (cinnamon) and just a slight
sourness (mashed strawberries). Other
than that it’s brilliant whisky
once again. With water: funnily, this
one is now rounder and smoother than
#8, more on dried fruits, sultanas,
other raisins, and then there’s
a more distinct woodiness (at the
carpenter’s.) A tad less complex
and multidimensional but certainly
not less enjoyable. Mouth (neat):
very strong, let’s not take
chances (although we could check that
this one seems to be rather oakier
and drier than cask #8). With water:
indeed, the oak is a little more ‘invading’
but it’s still balanced and
beautifully smooth. A strawberry pie
topped with honey, spices and vanilla
sauce. Finish: long, quite beautiful
once again, with unexpected mouldy
notes that remind us of the best old
pu-erh teas. Fantastic. Comments:
I had first thought cask #8 would
have easily defeated this one but
it’s not the case at all, mainly
thanks to this one’s wonderfully
complex finish. SGP:642 -
91 points.
WATCH
RALFY'S VIDEOS! Everything is
nice in Ralfy's work. The tone of
voice (and the accent ;-)), the content
(content over function, that's the
Web as it should be), the 'live' feeling...
and of course the spirit. Watch for
instance his recent interviews
with Glengoyne's Duncan
(clips #41, 42, 43), they are just
excellent. Very well done, Ralfy,
I'm a fan.
MUSIC
– Recommended
listening: Canada's Molly
Johnson- Sleep In Late
(from her CD Another Day). Please
buy Molly Johnson's music.
April
6, 2009
TASTING
– ANOTHER FOUR CAOL ILA
There’s
a constant stream of new indie Caol
Ilas these days, whether young or
quite old (1979-1984) and that’s
good news since all of them range
from very good to excellent.
Caol
Ila 28 yo 1980 (50.5%, Exclusive Casks,
finished in fresh American oak, cask
#4936)
The Exclusive Casks are a part of
David Stirk’s excellent range,
all bottlings having been finished
in new oak for three months. We’re
expecting quite some vanillin…
Colour: pale gold. Nose: interesting!
A typical Caol Ila encapsulated in
a rather elegant oakiness, not a vanilla
bomb at all actually. Fresh oysters,
seaweed, wet limestone, dill and only
hints of grated coconut, ginger, caramel
and Alexander cocktail (say Bailey’s).
Faint grainy notes (porridge). The
oakiness gets more obvious after fifteen
minutes. Mouth: it’s the oak
that strikes first now, pretty much
in the style of the young ‘wooden’
Glenmorangies (post oak, Missouri,
artisan et al). The combo works well
here, and it seems that it makes the
saltiness stand out. Other than that
we’re all on café latte,
vanilla fudge, gingerbread, pine resin
and kippers, the peat working more
as a spice. Finish: rather long, Caol
Ila’s usual coastal peatiness
finally winning the ‘fight’
over the new oak. Comments: a Caol
Ila that’s got something Californian,
whatever that means. Great as a variant.
The most vanilled of the four. SGP:546
- 86 points.
Caol
Ila 26 yo 1982/2009 (55.9%, Duncan
Taylor, Rare Auld, cask #2741)
Colour: straw. Nose: fresher and more
vibrant than the ‘exclusive’,
with much more citrusy notes, including
tangerines, grapefruits and plain
lemons. Gets maybe just a tad sourish/acidic
but that adds to this one’s
particularities. More and more on
a plate of lemon-sprinkled oysters.
Medium peatiness. With water: superb.
A working kiln on Islay (not at Caol
Ila, obviously), sheep, seawater,
old leather, Havana cigars…
Great nose! Much less lemon when reduced.
Mouth (neat): perfect attack, very
typical, extremely well balanced.
Half-rounded like some older CIs can
be but getting very lemony once again,
which is quite beautiful. Gets sharper
and sharper, beautifully so. With
water: excellent. Everything is there
in the mix, peat, spices, coatal elements,
fruits (dried), spices… And
lemons. Finish: long, in the same
vein. Classy. Comments: a winning
Caol Ila from a good year. Strange
that they were making such good spirit
at Caol Ila while so many distilleries
were tottering back then. The most
lemony of the four. SGP:456
– 89 points.
Caol
Ila 26 yo 1982/2009 (63%, The Perfect
Dram, 120 bottles)
Colour: straw. Nose: a little silent
when compared with its sibling, probably
because of the very high strength
(63% at 26 years of age, not bad!)
Apple peelings and fresh walnuts,
linseed oil, iodine. Austere and sharp.
With water: the same kind of development
as in the DT, only even bigger. Extremely
organic. Then seafood (fresh oysters,
scallops), leather, ginger…
And a little vanilla/ginger that reminds
us of the Exclusive Cask. Grassy smokiness
(garden bonfire under the rain.) Gets
the more mineral. Flintstones. Mouth
(neat): very, very strong but one
can feel that it is great whisky-
huh! With water: very vegetal and
grassy, also with a bigger smokiness
than in its bros and sistas. Apple
peelings, green tea, liquorice, smoked
trout (rather than sea fish), even
smoked ham… Finish: long, clean,
liquoricy and salty. Comments: the
most coastal of the four. SGP:357
- 89 points.
And
now, an older official version for
good measure… Caol
Ila 21 yo 1977/1999 (61.3%, Rare Malts)
Colour: straw. Nose: very different
from the indies, much more on fresh
butter and various herbs (dill, fresh
cabbage, spearmint.) Whiffs of metal
and motor oil. With water: well, not
its best part. Wet cardboard and yoghurt
– not a good swimmer? Mouth
(neat): extremely different once again.
Very powerful but kind of ‘chemically
pleasant’ (I’m sorry,
I know that doesn’t make much
sense), with bags of lime, lemon squash,
citrus mint, asparagus and white sauvignon,
then sorrel, absinth, fennel and icy
mint. Bidis (these small Indian cigarettes).
With water: very unusual development,
still in the same directions, that
is to say sort of chemical. Smoked
‘things’ (sorry), lemon
squash, rocket salad, vitamin C tablets
and ginger tonic. Hugely almondy,
in fact. Finish: long, a little more
on the tracks but still unusual. Comments:
a little strange that the official
version is the most singular. A good
Caol Ila anyway, the grassiest of
the four. SGP:366 - 85 points.
STEPHANE
THE MAD MALT MIXOLOGIST
proposes his malt
cocktails for the
Springtime
TODAY:
"Kill
Ming"
Pour into a shaker, with ice:
- 6 cl Yoichi NAS 40%
- 2 cl Mandarine Impériale
liqueur
- 1 cl Soho (lytchee liqueur)
- 2 cl lime juice
Shake, Strain into a glass with an
"asiatic look" of your choice,
then finish moderately with Perrier
or Schweppes Agrum's.
Deco: exotic fruits.
Comment: This Yoichi NAS is a perfect
blender whisky for exotic stuff, but
you may try this cocktail with other
young japanese whiskies ; or/and with
different exotic liqueurs (mango,
pineapple, passion fruit...).
MUSIC
– Recommended
listening: the good old Dr.
Feelgood doing All Through
The City (from Down by the jetty,
1975, with Lee Brilleaux and Wilko
Johnson). Please buy Dr Feelgood's
music.
April
5, 2009
TASTING
TWO
GLEN ALBYN
Glen Albyn was one of the three
Inverness distilleries, together
with Glen Mhor and Millburn. All
three were mothballed in 1983. I’ve
always had troubles with Glen Albyn
but I haven’t tried hundreds
of them.
Glen
Albyn 27 yo 1981/2009 (55%, Signatory,
cask #49, 225 bottles)
This one from a hogshead. Colour:
straw. Nose: powerful but not very
aromatic. Starts on grass and wet
chalk, getting then more and more
mineral and, well, chalky. Clay, limestone,
apple peeling, green tea and then
even more grass. Notes of leather.
With water: more soaked grains, wet
hay and then chives, and hints of
ginger tonic. Also something like
sorrel and lovage. Gets farmier, not
just from the watering. Horse sweat.
Mouth (neat): it is fruitier this
time, starting on orange drops, pineapple
drops and touches of tinned litchis.
It’s also very hot so let’s
ad water again. With water: works
well but once again, this is unusual
whisky. Chlorophyll gum, spearmint,
liquorice… The fruitiness almost
vanished with the addition of water.
Finish: very long, more resinous and
grassy again, as if it went back to
the initial aromas on the nose. Comments:
I guess nobody makes this wild style
of malt whisky anymore in Scotland
(peat rules anyway), so it may well
deserve a few extra points. Glen Albyn
really starts to be History. Anyway,
this one is the best I ever had. SGP:362
- 84 points.
Glen
Albyn 33 yo 1974/2008 (58.9%, The
Clydesdale Company, cask #0016/1601,
248 bottles)
Colour: pale gold. Nose: a little
fruitier and more expressive than
the 1981 but still very grassy. White
cherries, kirsch, butter, green apples
and hints of porridge. And the same
notes of wet rocks as in the 1981.
With water: ah, this works beautifully.
Morels, old leather, moss, tobacco,
eucalyptus and hints of patchouli.
An unusual dram. Mouth (neat): very
close to the 1981 but with an added
spiciness (green pepper). Very lemony
in fact, rather than orangey. A little
fuller than the 1981. With water:
excellent! Lemon balm sweets, lemon
marmalade, speculoos, apple spirit
(white calvados) and cough drops.
Finish: rather long, all on squeezed
lemon (skin included). Comments: the
best Glen Albyn I ever had ;-). SGP:462
- 86 points.
MUSIC
– Recommended
listening: excellent new jazz by Ken
Vandermark's Vandermark
5: New Acrylic (from the CD Beat Reader).
Top notch! Please buy Vandermark 5's
music...
April
3, 2009
CONCERT
REVIEW by Nick Morgan
JERRY DAMMERS' SPATIAL
AKA ORCHESTRA
PRESENTS COSMIC ENGINEERING
The Barbican, London, March 10th 2009
Isn’t
it nice, Serge, and wonderfully satisfying,
when you discover the answer to a
long-standing mystery? I, for example,
had never figured out where all that
Sci-Fi P-Funk stuff that underpinned
George Clinton’s Parliament
and Funkadelic, and Bootsy Collins’
Rubber Band, came from. It seemed,
as the youth of today might say, somewhat
‘random’. But now, thanks
to Jerry Dammers, founder of both
the
Specials and the 2-Tone
record label, I know. Collins
and Clinton were following the lead
of band-leader, cosmic philosopher
and electronic keyboards pioneer,
Sun
Ra, and the various manifestations
of his jazz Arkestra, who still perform
today, over fifteen years after his
death. Where did Ra get his ideas
from, I hear you asking? Well that’s
simple. He went to Saturn, possibly
in the late 1930s, an incident, that
as one might imagine, shaped his life
for ever after. Ra, already a practised
professional musician, used this experience
to reshape his musical and political
ideas – with the Arkestra donning
outlandish costumes inspired by both
outer space, and Ra’s interest
in all things Egyptian - and increasingly
pushing at the musical boundaries
of jazz. Ra was quick to adopt new
musical technology, including one
of the first prototype mini-moog synthesisers,
but at the same time showed an enduring
respect for the great ‘standards’
and a particular liking for the songs
of Walt Disney: Ra and his Arkestra
collaborated with Hal Wilner for his
first venture into a Disney tribute
album.
So
what? Well, Jerry
Dammers, something of
a recluse since his great days in
the late 70s and 80s, has put together
what might be termed a rather sophisticated
tribute band to Sun Ra and his music.
It’s the Spatial AKA Orchestra,
and in this one-off Barbican show
they’re performing ‘Cosmic
Engineering’, described as a
tribute to Sun Ra “and other
musical mavericks”.
Jerry Dammers
I’m
not sure if Dammers has been to Saturn
(let’s face it, Coventry might
have been enough), but he certainly
seems to have taken the Sun Ra stuff
right to his heart: “a lot of
times it was humorous, and a lot of
times it was ridiculous, and a lot
of times it was right on the money”,
said one former band-member. The stage
is dressed with left-over exhibits
from the Tutankhamen exhibition at
our great 02 in Greenwich last year,
and a bevy of redundant props from
the BBC’s fantastic Dr Who series
(vintage 1963-2008). Overhead a spaceship
hangs in the air, piloted by lifeless
aliens.
To the stage left, Dammers, cloaked
and masked to both the front and back
of his head, is surrounded by a crescendo
of keyboards and begins to vamp out
a typically disjointed and abrupt
Raesque solo. It’s so engrossing
that it’s a while before anyone
notices the band, chanting (there’s
a lot of chanting) and playing ‘After
the end of the world’, as they
walk, costumed from head to toe like
the extras from ‘Carry on Cleo’,
to the stage. When the Photographer
sees them she starts, fearful that
a childhood nightmare of being attacked
by Cybermen is being played out for
real.
The Photographer's worst nightmare
What followed was a wonderfully entertaining
and joyful hour and a half delivered
by a top class band featuring the
stellar saxophone line-up of Denys
Baptiste, Larry
Stabbins, Jason
Yarde and Nathaniel
Facey. Zoe
Rahman complements Dammers on
keyboards, while Francine
Luce provided vocals, Anthony
Joseph (author of, amongst other
things, The African Origins of UFOs)
poetry, and Space Ape some memorable
singing and, to use an unfashionable
phrase, toasting. But there are another
dozen or so in the band, all excellent
as well. Dammers it may be noted,
has a bit of a reputation as a control
freak, and he’s certainly in
charge here, anxiously flipping the
pages of his ring binder (the musician’s
badge of authority), striding out
to the front of the orchestra and
conducting in a sort of scarecrow
way, pointing out soloists, and occasionally
waving notes at them. But no-one seems
to mind – in fact the enthusiasm
of the band, which lasts from start
to finish (when they chant their way
off the stage to ‘Space is the
place’ and end up playing outside
the coat-check) is quite infectious.
As is the music (not all Sun Ra compositions
or arrangements): there are some Alice
Coltrane tunes; ‘Jungle madness’,
written by ‘the High Priest
of Exotica’, Martin
Denny, and ‘Bird’s
Lament’, written by Rastafarian
Mystic Cedric Brooks. And some of
it – like ‘Unmask the
Batman’ – is very funny.
But they all get the Dammers’
take on Sun Ra. The eclectic keyboards,
tightly-arranged brass lines, the
odd band chant or chorus, sparkling
solos (it’s invidious, but I’ll
call out Nathaniel Facey for his solo
on Ra’s ‘Discipline in
retrospect’) crumbling into
cacophony (there’s a lot of
cacophony) and finally recovering
into structure. It’s nothing
short of bloody brilliant.
Now
did I mention the Specials? That was
Dammers’ band; we’re off
to see them next month minus Dammers,
as they’ve chosen to reform
without him (“not so”,
they say, “yes it is”,
says Jerry). Anyway, Jerry referred
to his former band only once, so I’ll
do the same. What I’ll end on
is the sensational version of the
Specials’ 1981 hit Ghost Town.
It always was the most chilling of
songs – as bleak and threatening
as the dreary derelict urban landscape
it described. Dammers’ Sun Ra
version, after a jolly start where
we all gargle the introductory melody,
turns into an even more sinister and
dark piece, with Space Ape giving
the lyrics added vibrancy and poignancy.
When this was a hit, if you don’t
recall, we were in a recession in
the UK, businesses were falling like
flies, unemployment was soaring and
innocents were being murdered in Northern
Ireland. Ring any bells? Too much
fighting on the dance floor indeed.
- Nick Morgan (photographs by
Kate)
Listen:
check the musicians' MySpace pages
(links in the review)
TASTING
– TWO SUPERB PULTENEY
Old
Pulteney 8 yo (100°proof, Gordon
& MacPhail, Licensed bottling,
late 1970s)
Colour: gold. Nose:
rather punchy, starting all on a metal
(aluminium, pan), grass and paraffin.
Slight fruitiness behind all that
(cider apples) but the grassiness
is rather extreme. Whiffs of car engine.
With water: it’s extremely leafy
and leathery now, with a rather big
peatiness and a general profile that
reminds us a bit of almost neighbour
old Clynelish. Motor oil, wax, shoe
polish and ‘old Jaguar’.
Well… Also hints of quinces.
Mouth (neat): excellent and big, superbly
waxy/resinous with a lot of orange
marmalade and a distinct saltiness.
Much more expressive than on the nose
when neat. Goes on with quite some
walnuts, cloves, pepper, lime juice,
liquorice and mint sweets… Not
the most complex palate ever but it’s
superbly ‘full’. Water
is not needed but we have to respect
our procedures, so here goes…
With water: exceptional. Call the
anti-maltoporn brigade. Finish: long,
magnificent, emphatic. Comments: simply
one of the most sublime 8yos ever,
of much higher quality than the more
mundane 70°proof – even
when reduced to +/-40%. Perfect bottle
ageing here, no way this was as great
when it was bottled. Sorry, there’s
no batch code on the back of the label,
not sure all batches were that phantastic.
SGP:672 - 93 points.
Old
Pulteney 1995/2009 (61.2%, OB for
Pipefest Basel 2009, cask #2971)
The profits of this bottling will
be transferred to a Swiss association
that helps children who suffer from
cancer (Kinderkrebs Stiftung Regio
Basilensis). Just because of that,
this bottling deserves a 99 score
- or more. Colour: pale straw. Nose:
much fruitier than the old G&M
(Williams pears) but the grassiness
is well here, as well as whiffs of
wet leaves, paraffin again, fresh
almonds, seaweed and sea breeze, apple
peeling and graphite/linseed oil.
Very, very... well, Pulteney. With
water: bursts with fermented pears
(you know, the stuff that distillers
use to distil pear spirit) and then
the same kind of leafy/leathery notes
as in the old 8. Very restless, we
like that. Mouth (neat): sure it’s
very strong but once again, it’s
not unlike the old (undiluted) 8yo
but with some added fresh fruits (apples,
pears, pineapples). With water: even
more fruits (a little bubblegum and
quite some strawberries) and an obvious
coastal character coming out (salt,
oysters). Finish: long, with some
pepper and even a little mustard joining
the dance. Comments: a true malt whisky,
without any of these tiresome modern
tricks. SGP:731 - 87
‘organoleptical’ points,
99 ‘emotional’ points.
April
2, 2009
TASTING
– THREE LOCHSIDE
As you may know, Lochside in Montrose
stopped distilling in 1992 and was
demolished in 2004 or thereabouts.
Lochside
14 yo 1990/2005 (50%, Douglas Laing
OMC, ref #1646, 324 bottles)
Colour: white wine. Nose: well, it
is not one of these ultra-fruity Lochsides
such as the ones from the 60s or even
many excellent 1981s, rather an old-school
Highlander with big notes of heather,
wax and grass. Whiffs of farmyard,
wet wool, leaves, kelp and then mustard/horseradish.
Gets grassier and grassier. Flower
shop. A very austere Lochside but
the sharpness is superb… Mouth:
more fruits but also an immense resinous
bitterness that’s far from being
unpleasant. White tequila, green apples,
grapefruits… And more and more
lemon. A sharp profile and quite some
character. Finish: long, with even
more lemon and a slight sugariness.
Lemon pie. A lot of citrus in the
aftertaste. Comments: extremely different
from earlier Lochsides but still very
nice. SGP:461 - 84 points.
Lochside
15 yo 1990/2005 (50%, Douglas Laing
OMC, ref #1648, 275 bottles)
Colour: white wine. Nose: the same
kind of huge grassiness as in the
14yo but the rest is even more austere,
with only hints of smoke and espresso
coffee. French beans, asparagus, hints
of blueberries. That’s not quite
enough to make this one a little sexy
in our opinion. Mouth: sharp, grassy,
leafy and leathery, without the citrus
fruits this time. A little pine resin.
Finish: long but still very grassy,
getting drying. A lot of pepper too.
Comments: not much to say. Not one
of the best Lochsides in my book.
SGP:271 - 78 points.
Lochside
21 yo 1987/2008 (62.4%, The Perfect
Dram, 199 bottles)
There are very few new Lochsides these
days, so this is one is great news.
Colour: pale gold. Nose: once again,
this one seems to be rather austere,
oily and grassy but the very high
strength may well block most aromas.
Quite some coffee, as almost always
with these very powerful whiskies.
With water: very, very nice profile!
Quite some nutmeg and cardamom –
a lot of nutmeg actually, citrons,
green tobacco (Indonesian), liquorice
and just faint whiffs of kerosene.
Superb profile but water is obligatory.
Mouth (neat): powerful but not exactly
hot, with much more fruits than on
the nose when neat. Tangerines and
grapefruits. Slightly bubblegummy.
With water: we’re now much closer
to the old-style Lochsides, with these
very typical notes of passion fruits,
oranges, tangerines and just hints
of coconuts. Wonderfully fresh. Finish:
long, with the spices kicking in (cardamom
again, a little ginger, red pepper…)
Comments: believe it or not, we were
just starting to notice the absence
of very good new Lochsides when this
one came in. Serendipity! SGP:541
- 91 points.
MUSIC
– Recommended
listening: John
Hiatt - Same old man
(from the eponymous CD). Please buy
John Hiatt's music!
April
1, 2009
EXCLUSIVE! ROLL AWAY PEAT MONSTERS, ROLL
OUT BIOFUEL!
Skye, sunset over Loch
Bracadale and the entrance to Loch
Harport
We
have just received a telephone call
from a well-informed source, the daughter-in-law
of a cousin of the nephew of a neighbour
of a prominent Scottish
National Party (SNP) MSP whose
name we have promised not to reveal.
Our informant is a keen Whiskyfun
reader and we are staggered by her
news.
From
2012, the SNP plans a major realignment
of economic activity in the Hebrides
favouring energy production from renewable
sources. Of the numerous projects
under scrutiny, some are already through
decision stage ready for rubber-stamping
by the Scottish
Parliament, with no opposition
expected from London.
In
outline, the whole Outer Hebridean
economy will be re-geared towards
electricity production through extensive
siting of wind farms on Lewis, Harris,
South Uist, Barra and St Kilda. Initial
estimates of around 7,500 wind turbines
have been circulating but some sources
suggest an incredible total of over
12,000.
In
a move that will support the SNP’s
anti-alcohol agenda, economic focus
in the Inner Hebrides, now dominated
by single malt whisky and tourism,
will be switched to biofuel production,
mainly on Islay, Jura, Mull and Skye.
Arran is not thought to be involved.
In the next few days, all distillery-owning
companies will be asked to start the
process of relocating whisky capacity
to the mainland by an end-of-2012
deadline. The cost of converting former
distilleries into biofuel plants and
compensation for any operating losses
would be met in full by the Scottish
government until summer 2010. It also
pledges to the distilleries the purchase
of their biofuel output at a price
linked to Brent crude (Brent +10.7%
according to leaked information),
for the period up to 2060.
Stunned
by information fit to alarm any malt
enthusiast, we asked our source what
would happen to any distillery refusing
to comply with the initiative. It
seems immediate nationalisation followed
by closure would result. Whatever
the case, moves towards large-scale
whisky production on the mainland
(e.g. Girvan or Roseisle) now appear
to make all the sense in the world
and suggest that certain spirits giants
had, as often is the case, largely
anticipated these new economic and
environmental measures.
Roseisle
Distillery, Moray: setting new benchmarks in energy efficiency
and its environmental footprint (photograph: BBC)
For
the time being, we don’t know
whether whisky brand names, mostly
corresponding to places, will be preserved,
but we feel neither the Scottish authorities
nor the Scotch
Whisky Association would deny
rights to existing owners, given the
huge commercial benefits at stake.
However, this would be in direct conflict
with the SWA’s new, soon-to-be
law ‘definitions’ on Scotch.
The SWA are now apparently considering
their future in the light of these
new circumstances and the possibility
of reforming themselves as the Scottish
Wind Association.
This
morning we were told the SNP’s
official list is as follows: Ardbeg,
Bowmore, Bruichladdich, Bunnahabhain,
Caol Ila, Isle of Jura, Lagavulin,
Laphroaig, Talisker and Tobermory.
The likely fate of the little Kilchoman
distillery was not clear but it could
be that the list has not been finalised.
Port Ellen Maltings would be transformed
into a biofuel collection and distribution
centre. And in a shock
development, we have just heard that
the ‘green’ Prince
Charles of Wales has indicated
he would be happy to transfer his
coveted Royal Warrant to the new Laphroaig
bio-diesel fuel. Malt enthusiasts
the world over will be up in arms…
TASTING
THE NEW KISS OF DEATH (are they mad!?)
21st Century Distillers is a brand
new company that’s just been
established in Port Ellen, and it
seems that actor Dan Aykroyd himself
is one of the main shareholders. Thanks
to very good contacts within the industry,
especially on Islay, the owners have
been able to acquire exactly nine
casks of Bruichladdich’s secret
‘Octomore X8’ (732ppm)
and nine casks of Ardbeg’s no
less secret ‘Ultima Quasar’
(729ppm), both spirits being just
3 years old. All casks have then been
vatted and finished for two weeks
in Finnish Terva Snapsi tar liqueur
casks (a Finnish finish, isn’t
that clever?) The end result has just
been bottled – very unusual
bottle methinks – and will hit
the shelves later in April.
It’s
still unclear whether this very strange
beverage will be available in the
US or not, but we’ve heard that
the excellent John Hansell over at
The Malt Advocate has also got a preview
sample from the company, so there
should be good hopes – or fears?
Kiss
of Death (70%, 21st Century Distillers,
blended malt, 3,600 bottles, 2009)
Colour: straw. Nose: waaah! How powerful!
Starts on mega-huge notes of acetone
and whiffs of a dragster’s exhaust
pipe just after a run, mixed with
hints of Partagas Lusitanias (at the
purin) and brand new Nokia rubber
boots (size UK 14). Huge sooty notes
too. With water: the liquid tar really
comes out now, as well as whiffs of
burnt oregano and metal polish. I
must say I absolutely adore this nose.
Mouth: quite sippable at such strength
(I said ‘quite’.) The
tarry/smoky notes are actually completely
out of control, but that’s part
of the fun here in our view. But aarrgh,
now it gets extremely hot, quick,
let’s add water. With water:
now we have a few coastal notes flying
around (dead whelks - or dead wulk,
said Dave Broom, who also found whiffs
of rotting limpet on the nose and
aromas of live fish in vinegar on
the palate) but other than that it’s
still immensely tarry and smoky, like
if they had burned some brand new
Pirellis in the kilns – yes,
on top of the peat. Also ash (like
eating an ashtray, really). Finish:
as long as a Fidel Castro speech.
Comments: mas especial indeed. No
doubt this will please the most extreme
peatophiles, let’s only hope
that the recent news about the Islay
Distilleries’ relocation on
the mainland won’t prevent 21st
Century Distillers from building up
their range in the near future! SGP:019
– 94 points. (btw,
we’ve also heard that there
will be a Blended Malt/Single Cask
out for Feis Ile. Guaranteed eBay
fodder?)
MUSIC
– Recommended
listening: the phantastic Heino
singing a very grrrroooovey Blau
Blueht Der Enzian around 1972 (or
was it 1982? 1992? 2002?) Anyway,
a true master of modern rock and
roll at his very best, please buy
Heino's music!