Google Some Cognac for Christmas
 
 

Serge whiskyfun
Home
Thousands of tastings,
all the music,
all the rambligs
and all the fun
(hopefully!)

Warning

Facebook Twitter Logo

Whiskyfun.com
Guaranteed ad-free
copyright 2002-2015

 

 
Hi, this is one of our (almost) daily tastings. Santé!
   
   
 

December 25, 2015


Whiskyfun

 

Xmas

Some Cognac for Christmas
(a rather insane session)

These won’t be malternatives. Because after all, old Cognacs couldn’t really be malternatives, as it’s rather Scotch whisky that, initially, took off as an alternative to Cognac, a good 120 years ago. I’m sure you know the story, the gentry used to drink Cognac, especially in the UK, but the phylloxera destroyed Cognac’s vineyards from around 1875 on, and the Scots lost no time in stepping into the breach that disaster opened up. See, for example, this old back label from before WWII…

Gillon

But which Cognacs shall we try today? Why not pre-phylloxeric ones? Or at least old Cognacs that do contain some pre-phylloxeric distillates? Because you see, this is well Christmas… But first things first, let’s prepare and calibrate our nose and palate with a little apéritif, because we need them to be rather finely tuned today…

Reviseur

Le Réviseur XO (40%, OB, Petite Champagne, +/-2014) Two stars and a half Some single estate Cognac belonging to Domaines Abecassis, just like the brands ABK6 and Leyrat. Colour: amber. Nose: good news, it’s a fresh and fruity one, rather aromatic, without any excessive boisé or caramel and prunes. I rather find williams pears, peaches, and melons, then just a touch of vanilla, coffee, and honey. Plus perhaps our beloved ripe mirabelles. Very nice nose. Mouth: not big, but fresh, this time with a little more caramel, raisins, and honeys. Classic ‘Sunday’ Cognac, good but lacking oomph, mainly because of the low strength. Caramelizes your palate a bit, if you see what I mean. Not something that I particularly enjoy, even if this is very fine Cognac for sure. Finish: short, honeyed, caramelly. The pears and the vanilla are back in the aftertaste. Comments: we shall call it a fair and fine Cognac of medium age. Or perhaps a perfect stepping stone… SGP:541 - 78 points.

Good, older Cognacs. I’m lucky enough to have the whole set of Courvoisier’s Erté Collection on the tasting table, thanks to a Venetian gentleman whose name I’ll mention a little later.  The Erté Collection gathers seven bottlings plus one, each containing Grande Champagne Cognacs of old age (said to be 60 years old on average), the oldest being from the 1892 vintage, so possibly from pre-phylloxeric vines. Courvoisier issued one decanter per year during the late 1980s and early 1990s, each one celebrating a further step in the Cognac-making process. What I don’t quite know yet is if they were all from the same vatting, kept in a vatting tank and partly bottled each year, or all bottled at the same time and issued gradually, or if they’re simply different vattings/blends. Please be sure that we’ll try to find out, but what’s sure is that the colours aren’t all exactly the same.

Erté Collection

Courvoisier's seven plus one 'Erté' decanters

Vigne

Courvoisier 'Erté Collection - No.1 Vigne' (40%, OB, Grande Champagne, 1988) Three stars and a halfVigne is vine, as you know. Colour: dark amber. Nose: classic, very classic old Cognac, rather on chocolate and Demerara sugar than on fresh fruits. So it’s a ‘warm’ vatting, perhaps a notch retro (as retro as the decanters), and certainly not an aromatic bomb. Develops mainly on all kinds of raisins, which is very ‘retro’ as well.  Mouth: same feeling. A caramelly sweetness, then some cooked honey (honeyed peanuts and pecans), and an avalanche of raisins. A little toffee as well. Pretty light mouth feel. Finish: quite short, on caramel and raisins. Comments: old style Cognac, extremely far from what modern houses and growers are making or selecting these days. Perhaps a little lazy for contemporary palates, but certainly very fine. Just a bit… Out of fashion? Reminds me of some eastern-European or Spanish brandies, just with less sugar. SGP:630 - 84 points.

Erte Vendanges

Courvoisier 'Erté Collection - No.2 Vendanges' (40%, OB, Grande Champagne, 1989) Four stars and a half Vendanges stands for harvest, but you knew that as well. This colour is darker. Colour: darker amber. Nose: different! Drier, almost smoky at times, and also a little gamy. Bouillon, cooked marrow, cured ham, and then rather bitter chocolate and black raisins. Much less honey and caramel than in No.1, which is pretty good news in my book. Mouth: indeed it’s different. Bolder, more ‘responsive’, with orange jam, honeydew, maple syrup, stewed peaches (always enjoy peaches in Cognac), then indeed a little more Demerara sugar, and even hints of molasses, but that’s all more than all right. Finish: shortish but longer than No.1. A pleasant earthiness in the aftertaste. Comments: now we’re talking! SGP:641 - 88 points.

Now, provided they’re from the same batch, how come can they be so different (well, not earth-shatteringly different)? We have to remember one thing with old decanters that were sold in beautiful presentation cases, some buyers tended to keep them lying on their side for years and years. It’s true that some packagings did suggest that was the way to keep them. But we all now that’s a pretty disastrous way, and it’s not impossible, with this collection, that not all decanters had been kept the same way, which may have altered some of them. But let’s go on…

Distillation

Courvoisier 'Erté Collection - No.3 Distillation' (40%, OB, Grande Champagne, 1990) Four stars Distillation means… right, right. Colour: light coffee, so even darker. Nose: an even drier one, even if we’re very close to No.2. Perhaps more rocks and stones, and perhaps a little more herbs and teas? I do also seem to detect old roses… But it’s the shiest so far. Mouth: extremely close to No.2, even quite hard to distinguish. Perhaps a touch of strawberry jam? Perhaps ripe bananas? Finish: short to medium, always with Demerara sugar and molasses. More oranges in the aftertaste, and the retro-olfaction is all on marmalade. Comments: same ballpark as No.2. Great old old-school Cognac, just a little slack. Just a little. SGP:441 - 87 points.

Once again, a great old Cognac, but I’m not totally sure they are spirits for people who, like me, enjoy they spirits punchy and well-chiselled. But let’s go on…

Vieillissement

Courvoisier 'Erté Collection - No.4 Vieilissement' (40%, OB, Grande Champagne, 1991) Four stars Vieillissement means ageing, of course. Colour: light coffee. Nose: same as No.3, aroma for aroma and word for word. Perhaps an added touch of damp earth, but I may be dreaming. Perhaps a wee tad fresher? Mouth: same, it’s almost identical, but this time we’re finding a notch more coffee. Well, you could quaff ten litres of each and keep arguing about minor differences, without managing to come up with definitive conclusion. Finish: ditto. Demerara. Comments: very good. Imagine an Erté Collection at cask strength! SGP:441 - 87 points.

Oh by the way, Erté (1892-1990) was a Russian-born French designer, rather into art-déco. I think he’s a bit forgotten these days. But let’s move on…

Degustation

Courvoisier 'Erté Collection - No.5 Dégustation' (40%, OB, Grande Champagne, 1992) Four stars and a half Degustation stands for what we’re doing just now. Tasting. Colour: coffee, so even darker. Nose: we’re in the same ballpark yet again, but this time I’m finding rather more chocolate, as well as mocha and Corinthian raisins. It’s ‘darker’, and that’s not only the colour, and even drier than No.3 & 4. Love these whiffs of beef stock and Spanish ham. The dried porcinis as well. Mouth: perhaps a little more liqueury than the other ones this time, and a little balsamic as well. I find rather more rancio than in the others, as well as more earth. My favourite so far. Finish: medium, chocolaty, beefy. A little tar in the aftertaste. Comments: excellent, fuller, better shaped. Even if it’s the same vatting (but is it?) SGP:462 - 89 points.

Esprit

Courvoisier 'Erté Collection - No.6 L'Esprit du Cognac' (40%, OB, Grande Champagne, 1993) Four stars and a half Cognac’s Spirit. They must have hired some new marketers at Courvoisier’s around 1993 ;-). Colour: coffee. Nose: same as No.5. And this is not Chanel. Maybe a wee-wee-wee tad earthier. Mouth: same Cognac indeed. Perhaps a little… Not. Finish: idem. Comments: not much else to add. How was the turkey, by the way? SGP:462 - 89 points.

Only one plus one more occasions to find a 90+… Unless we go on after the Ertés…

Part des Anges

Courvoisier 'Erté Collection - No.7 La Part des Anges' (40%, OB, Grande Champagne, 1994) Four stars and a half La Part des Anges means the Angels’ Share. Yes they have that in Cognac too. Colour: dark mahogany, so much darker. Nose: well, the colour’s even darker, but the nose isn’t much different. As usual, once you’ve seen the colour, you tend to find ‘black notes’, liquorice, tar, soot, coal and all that. But they aren’t there, once again this one’s very similar to the previous ones. Perhaps a little more ‘roasted’, with more coffee beans? I also seem to find hints of truffles. White ones! Mouth: dry and molassy at the same time, then full of chestnut honey (if you never tried chestnut honey, which I often use in my tasting notes, please do, you’ll find funny notes of… brown spirits). Finish: medium, and leafier than the others. That’s an asset. Black teas, molasses, a little liquorice… Comments: excellent, you’d just want to wonder if reducing such old glories to 40% isn’t, or wasn’t, the equivalent of murder. Quasi-murder. SGP:452 - 88 points.

Good, in 1994, the Collection was complete, but they decided to add a last one in 1995, called the ‘Inédit’. It’s not exactly part of the Collection, and yet it is, but not… I think it was a larger batch. And we’ve got it.

Courvoisier 'Erté Collection - Inédit' (40%, OB, Grande Champagne, 4000 bottles, 1995)

Courvoisier 'Erté Collection - Inédit' (40%, OB, Grande Champagne, 4000 bottles, 1995) Four stars Sometimes nicknamed ‘No.8’, but it’s not. By the way, inédit means unreleased – or something like that. Colour: coffee. Nose: perhaps a little less aromatic, and perhaps a little more on tobacco? It’s also very faintly medicinal. Half a drop of eucalyptus essence, which suggests a little more French oak, or a longer ageing indeed. Mouth: it may be the most ‘modern’ of them all, but it’s also got this feeling of caramel and raisins that the last ones had almost forgotten about. Not quite my favourite feeling. Finish: shortish, sweet. May lack zing. Comments: another very very good old Cognac, but it’s as if you were feeling that it’s the end of a reign. I’m not a huge fan of this last bottling. Oh, by the way, some say that it was banned in the US because the decanter was showing a naked woman. Yeah, why not ban Matisse and Picasso while you’re at it. You may keep Miley and Nicki. SGP:630 - 85 points.

You’re right, not one single 90, that’s very frustrating. I’m feeling the same, but what was lacking from all of those was a little more freshness, and a little more complexity, perhaps. So let’s try another very old Cognac, and perhaps yet another one. But I promise, no more than two, because Santa’s waiting.

Bache

Bache-Gabrielsen ‘Le Sein de Dieu’ (OB for Wealth Solutions, 150 decanters, 2015) Five stars A blend of only pre-phylloxeric cognacs, so all from the 19th century, plus a little 1790 for good measure. I guess anyone could write a whole novel about this one, but my friend and compatriot the very excellent and totally lovely Martine Nouet already did that. Kind of. So let’s be more down-to-earth, and simply taste it. Shall we experience a folle blanche extravaganza? BTW, I couldn’( find any information on the ABV. Probably not high. Colour: dark gold (it’s all a matter of demijohns, not casks). Nose: Waaah! I repeat, waaah! The first word that comes to mind is ‘elegance’, then ‘balance’. We’re having the subtlest candle waxes, some old apples from three years ago (kept in the attic), perhaps drops of very old vin de paille (straw wine), and what’s missing in many a commercial Cognac, flowers. In this case, that would be lilies. Many tinier aromas do appear after just one minute, chiefly soft embrocations, a very small touch of camphor, and then our much-beloved spirity earthiness. Any good aged spirit should have a little earth! Mouth: a very old Cognac that starts like some very old Calvados, that’s funny! What’s actually quite unusual is the fact that it hasn’t quite got the very delicate complexity that was to be found in the nose, and that it’s even a little rough. A little… So cider apples, greengages, white peaches, a touch of fudge and toffee, then rather tarte tatin and honeydew. Or fir honey, with a balsamic and eucalyptussy side.

What the master blender has achieved, rather impressively, was to gather only very old Cognacs that had never gotten oaky as such. Impressive, this is more ‘a vibrant echo of the past’ than ‘a tired old thing’. And that’s an understatement. Finish: short to medium, which is normal. You can’t expect a massive and eternal finish from such an old Cognac. It would rather play on honeys and pollens, actually, always with this balsamic feeling in the background. And guess what we find in the aftertaste? That’s right, peaches! (in syrup). Comments: perhaps a little literary and shy at times, but to think that Louis the Sixteenth still had his head on his shoulders when a part of this was distilled 225 years ago is pretty… Mindboggling. Not only rare, also very superb. SGP:551 - 91 points.

A last one. A legendary one. Ever heard of the year of the comet? (not the year of the cat, Al Kooper fans!) I always wanted to try one, and now’s the time… Because this is Christmas!

So… The next one is a legend, for many reasons. First, 1811 was the year of the great comet, aka the imperial comet, which added so much ‘sunshine’ to summertime that all wines from that vintage had been deemed legendary. Not that the wine merchants hadn’t already some sense of marketing, mind you. Second, Napoleon got so enamoured with that vintage that he bought many casks of 1811 Cognac, for his private imperial cellars. What’s more, as the only son of old Napo and Marie-Louise of Austria, the Roi de Rome aka Napoleon II aka L’Aiglon, was born in 1811, many distillers and merchants started to add ‘Roi de Rome’ to their 1811 Cognacs.

< 1811, citizens spotting the comet

But there are also many odd stories related to the 1811 vintage. Fakes, of course. Or even merchants who, already in the 19th century, were exploiting the very high reputation of the 1811 vintage and were labelling as ‘1811’ just any other vintage. What’s sure is that even in the early 20th century, some were still bottling some ‘1811’. So, is this a genuine bottle of 1811? We’ll simply never know, and it’s not the embossing in the neck (Roi de Rome 1811) that’ll make it 100% genuine. But this is a very old bottle for sure, possibly by Sazerac de Forge. The posh restaurant Louis XV in Monaco seem to still have a few of these and apparently, the last consumed bottle was drunk by Winston Churchill. I had thought he was only drinking Johnnie Walker Red! But it’s time to try it… (courtesy of a highly civilised Swiss gentleman – and dear friend).

Roi de Rome

Roi de Rome 1811 (unknown ABV, terroir unknown, grower unknown)

Roi de Rome 1811 (unknown ABV, terroir unknown, grower unknown) Five stars Colour: coffee. And I mean espresso. Nose: we aren’t far from most Ertés, not far at all. There are black raisins, then roasted chestnuts, then plenty of rancio (between leather, game, and tobacco, close to umami), and lastly, some stewed/jammy fruits, hard to pinpoint. Perhaps tamarind, perhaps blackcurrants. After ten minutes, it’s rather tar and pitch that come out, together with a little fir honey, which we already saw before. Undoubtedly very old. 1811? Impossible to say! Mouth: it’s got this little liqueury side that many a very old bottle had, perhaps because they used to season them with fruit liqueurs, precisely, or jams, coffee, honey, cooked fruits (paxarette like), concentrated wine, or else. Just like they do with rum today ;-). Or with the casks somewhere up north, because they’re not allowed to do that otherwise. There’s also a little salt – great counterbalance – and these bouillony herbs that we like so much. Flipside, the strength isn’t very high anymore (around 30%?) so it tends to become a little flabby, although the salt and the herbs do manage to keep it afloat. So is this good, you may ask? Yes, very! Finish: sweeter, not very long, obviously, but a little mentholy, which works just as well as salt to keep it alive. Let’s make it clear, it’s absolutely not tired. Perhaps a tad too syrupy, but who cares! Comments: I’m not taking the vintage into account, neither am I thinking of this baby’s historical pedigree (not to mention its utter rarity) when I’m writing that it’s a great spirit. Because it is. And quite possibly the oldest distillate I’ve ever tried, although I haven’t got any evidence. We wanted another 90+ for Christmas; we’ve got one. SGP:540 - 90 points.

Merry Christmas! (we’ve got more old stuff up our sleeves until new year’s eve, so stay tuned!)

(Happy holidays Diego, Michal, and Patrick!)

 

Pete McPeat and Jack Washback
PJ

PJ

 

 
   

 

 

 

Whiskyfun's Home
 
Whiskyfun's Facebook page Whiskyfun's Twitter page Whiskyfun's RSS feed